Estate Planning:
What is a Life Tenancy?
July 19, 1999
Question:
What is a life
tenancy? Someone told my client that he should establish a life
tenancy on an inheritance that has been directed to him after
the death of the first beneficiary.
Answer:
When it comes to estate planning, understanding what the various
legal concepts and devices mean, and what each does is the easy
part; but figuring out how to work them together into an asset-preserving,
tax-saving strategy is much more demanding and, potentially, complex.
Now, with that being said, I referred your inquiry about a "life
tenancy" to attorney David V. Schultz, who offers this definition
and advice:
A life tenancy is a form of ownership whereby X may use and enjoy
the property during his lifetime, but upon his death, the full
ownership of that property rests in Y. It normally only refers
to an interest in real estate, an asset that does not get consumed
(like cash, for instance); because the life tenant has a legal
duty to not "waste" the asset--meaning, not to do anything
that will diminish the value of what is due to pass, eventually,
to "the remainderman" (Y).
As to whether the establishment of a life tenancy in your particular
situation is advisable, a host of other background facts would
have to be known; and even then, I strongly recommend consulting
with an estate-planning attorney. Transactions of this type always
have tax ramifications--both gift and estate taxes--which can
only be factored in when the entire fact situation is known.
Potential Pitfalls
of Deferred Comp. Plans
January 7, 2000
Question:
I've heard that
one downside of nonqualified deferred compensation is that its
more risky that a 401(k)?
Answer:
Deferring compensation can be beneficial to highly paid executives
but precautions should be taken according to a recent article
in Blomberg's Personal Finance. One downside is that the nonqualified
deferred funds have greater risk than in a 4-1(k). The funds are,
in effect, a loan to the employer. If the employer goes bankrupt,
the employee is in the position of a creditor. Also in a merger
or other organizational change, repudiation may occur through
an adverse interpretation of ambiguous provisions. Or an employer
may decide to take advantage of an option to make a lump sum distribution.
Some ways to protect your client against these pitfalls: 1) Companies
often tinker with discount rates and mortality tables to short
change employees so if your clients are offered to be paid in
a lump sum always have an actuary review the offer to assure the
calculation is fair; 2) Ascertain a return that is appropriate
for the added risk assumed. Generally the smaller the company,
the larger your client's rate of return should be. Your client
should not be "getting the yield on triple A credit when
your client's company is triple B"; 3) Consider whether the
plan is funded by a device such as a "rabbi trust."
Your client will have a better chance of getting their money at
payout if the funds are actually put into a trust as the company
won't have access to that money for operating expenses. A bankruptcy
court can, however, access a "rabbi trust" to pay the
company's creditors; 4) Purchasing insurance covering loss of
deferred salary, as well as additional coverage for legal expenses,
is the most conservative protection devise. This type of policy
is offered by both AIG, through its American International Specialty
company and Zurich Financial Services through its Fidelity and
Deposit Company of Maryland subsidiary.
If you are already a platinum member, click here
to log in, otherwise you can click here
to apply for a platinum membership.